The 2026 bid cycle is different. Medicare plans are operating in an environment of rising medical loss ratios (MLR), tighter regulatory expectations and a payment landscape that looks meaningfully different from prior years. The result is simple: plans can no longer treat member engagement and rewards programs as nice-to-have experience-driven investments. They need interventions that move both the numerator and the denominator of the MLR calculation, with documentation that can withstand audits and support bid assumptions.
That is exactly where platforms like Healthmine are rapidly becoming mainstays in payer programs. These programs have graduated from member-experience tools to core MLR and Stars levers that plans can shape directly into their bids. In a near-flat margin landscape, incorporating Healthmine into the bid is less about describing the program and more about modeling it correctly, classifying it appropriately, and contracting it in a way that protects the plan’s MLR.
This 2026 update focuses on the mechanics by answering these questions:
- What’s changing with MLR in 2026?
- What evidence-based strategies will optimize MLR?
- How should Medicare plans structure their bids?
Let’s dive in.
The MLR environment in 2026
Across the industry, Medicare Advantage plans are experiencing upward pressure on loss ratios. The drivers are familiar: higher inpatient trends, increased use of post-acute care and higher-cost prescription drugs like GLP-1 medications and shifting risk profiles.
At the same time, payment updates for 2026 shifted the revenue baseline. Even with revenue growth, plans still face margin compression if medical trend outpaces the increase. That makes quality improvement programs more important.
All of this makes member engagement, care gap closure, HRA activation and adherence work far more financially meaningful. When structured as a quality improvement initiative and supported by platforms like Healthmine, these activities improve health outcomes, reduce avoidable utilization, strengthen medication adherence, and support more accurate risk capture. They also qualify as countable quality improvement expenses in the MLR numerator rather than administrative cost.
Just as importantly, effective engagement drives performance on Star Ratings and other quality programs. Stronger quality scores unlock Quality Bonus Payments, creating additional revenue that can be reinvested into benefit-in-design enhancements and expanded member benefits.
Done well, this creates a virtuous cycle — quality improvement fuels financial performance, which in turn funds better benefits and more meaningful engagement for members. When done poorly, these same efforts are reduced to administrative expense with little measurable impact.
The distinction now carries more weight.
Why evidence-based digital engagement belongs in quality improvement
To truly qualify as quality improvement, a program has to be more than innovative — it has to be grounded in evidence and a recognized best practice. That’s where digital engagement platforms like Healthmine stand apart.
Clinical research and industry studies show that well-designed digital engagement and incentive programs work. When members receive timely, personalized nudges — paired with meaningful incentives — they are more likely to complete preventive screenings, participate in health risk assessments and stay engaged in managing chronic conditions.
In other words, digital engagement isn’t just convenient; it measurably improves adherence to preventive care and recommended clinical actions.
Healthmine’s approach is built on this evidence. The platform translates nationally recognized preventive care guidelines and quality measures into practical, scalable programs that drive real behavior change. The results are measurable: higher screening rates, improved care gap closure, increased HRA completion, and sustained engagement over time. These outcomes aren’t theoretical — they show up in performance data and ROI analyses that demonstrate tangible quality and financial impact.
Just as importantly, Healthmine’s programs align with standards set by nationally recognized quality organizations. Healthmine is an NCQA-accredited administrator of the Health Risk Assessment and holds NCQA Wellness and Health Promotion Accreditation. These accreditations confirm that the platform meets rigorous clinical, operational and quality standards — and that its engagement strategies are rooted in accepted best practices, not marketing trends.
When done well, digital engagement becomes a true quality improvement engine. It improves member outcomes, supports preventive care adherence, strengthens quality performance, and contributes to long-term value for both members and health plans. That’s what distinguishes quality improvement from administrative activity—and why evidence-based digital engagement belongs squarely in the quality investment conversation.
How plans should talk about Healthmine in their 2026 bids
The narrative needs to shift away from engagement for its own sake and toward measurable financial and clinical outcomes. Healthmine’s QRM platform increases the likelihood of desired health outcomes in ways that are capable of being objectively measured and of producing verifiable results and achievements.
To create a strong business case for bid inclusion, focus on the following themes:
- The program increases preventive care uptake, medication persistence, and chronic condition management.
- The program reduces avoidable acute utilization.
- The program improves accuracy and completeness of member-reported health status and conditions.
- The program qualifies as a quality-improvement activity and is tracked through clearly defined KPIs.
- The program has measurable, documented MLR impact supported by clinical studies.
Plans should clearly describe how they will measure success, how often they will evaluate performance, and how the program fits into the plan’s overall quality and MLR strategy.
Why this approach matters in 2026
The margin environment is tight. Medical trend is rising faster than many plans predicted. Member engagement and rewards platforms are no longer optional extras; they are operational engines that can meaningfully shift financial performance if incorporated correctly.
The plans that win the 2026 cycle will be the ones that view platforms like Healthmine as MLR tools, not marketing features. They will model the impact carefully, contract intelligently, document thoroughly, and present the program in their bids as a measurable, defensible driver of clinical and financial improvement.
Summary
- Medicare bids face tighter margins and higher MLR pressure. Health plans must use interventions that measurably impact both costs and revenue and can be clearly documented and defended during audits. Because of how Healthmine’s platform sends campaigns and captures data, teams are relieved of much of the documentation burden.
- Member engagement must function as a quality improvement lever. When structured correctly, activities like care gap closure, HRA completion and adherence improvement reduce avoidable utilization, improve risk capture and qualify as quality improvement expenses in the MLR numerator, rather than administrative costs.
- Evidence-based digital engagement platforms (like Healthmine) enable measurable quality and financial impact. Grounded in clinical guidelines and backed by NCQA accreditation, these platforms improve preventive care uptake, chronic condition management, Star Ratings performance and ROI.
- Successful bids will position engagement platforms as core MLR and quality drivers. Plans should model impact explicitly, define KPIs, document outcomes and frame programs in bids around verifiable clinical results, MLR protection and financial performance — not member experience alone.











